skip navigation
NEC FUTURE

Tier 1 EIS

Tier 1 Draft EIS

 

 

Chapter 7.16 Full-sized Tables

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

Table 7.16-2 : Affected Environment: Section 4(f) Resources - Parks, Recreational Areas, and Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges
Geography Total Acres of Resources* Resources in the Affected Environment
Existing NEC Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
# of Parks Acres % of Total Park Acres # of Parks Acres % of Total Park Acres # of Parks Acres % of Total Park Acres # of Parks Acres % of Total Park Acres
D.C. 1,162 8 200 17% 8 200 17% 8 200 17% 8 210 18%
MD 108,124 78 1,020 1% 87 1,030 1% 89 1,090 1% 129 1,880 2%
DE 1,115 12 240 22% 12 240 22% 12 240 22% 12 245 22%
PA 10,628 50 560 5% 50 560 5% 47 780 7% 70 750 7%
NJ 4,792 14 210 4% 14 210 4% 14 225 5% 15 230 5%
NY 11,314 49 745 7% 49 750 7% 57 760 7% 66-91 1,265-1,855 11%-16%
CT 63,280 26 825 1% 28 865 1% 36 2,275 4% 7-32 1,470-2,555 1%-4%
RI 321,459 30 4,305 1% 31 4,910 2% 38 5,765 2% 27-38 4,025-5,765 1%-2%
MA 6,227 8 180 3% 8 180 3% 8 180 3% 8-20 180-330 3%-5%
TOTAL 528,101 275 8,285 2% 287 8,945 2% 309 11,515 2% 342-415 10,255-13,820 1%

Source: NEC FUTURE team, 2015
Note: There is one wild and scenic river, White Clay Creek, in the Affected Environment of all of the Action Alternatives. It is located in New Castle, DE. White Clay Creek qualifies for protection under Section 4(f) since the management plan for White Clay Creek addresses recreation and other Section 4(f) uses.
* Most of the resources are only partially located in the Affected Environment. The total number of acres represents the total acreage of the parklands, including acreages outside and inside the Affected Environment of the existing NEC or any alternative.

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

Table 7.16-12 : Affected Environment: Section 6(f) Resources
Geography Total Acres Resources* Existing NEC Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3**
# of 6(f) Resources Acres % of Total Park Acres # of 6(f) Resources Acres % of Total Park Acres # of 6(f) Resources Acres % of Total Park Acres # of 6(f) Resources Acres % of Total Park Acres
D.C. 1,040 4 165 16% 4 165 16% 4 165 16% 4 170 17%
MD 99,940 8 490 0% 10 500 1% 10 500 1% 14 990 1%
DE 90 1 90 100% 1 90 100% 1 90 100% 1 90 100%
PA 4,440 8 165 4% 8 165 4% 8 210 5% 9 280 6%
NJ 410 2 40 10% 2 40 10% 2 40 10% 2 40 10%
NY 4,020 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1-3 1-280 <0%-7%
CT 32,060 5 370 1% 5 370 1% 6 1,400 4% 1-5 40-1,030 0%-3%
RI 2,560 5 320 13% 6 370 14% 7 505 20% 5-7 320-505 13%-20%
MA 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
TOTAL 144,560 34 1,641 1% 37 1,701 1% 399 2,911 2% 37-45 1,931-3,391 1%-2%

Sources: National Rivers Inventory; LWCF; National Atlas of the United States; NPS; U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS; USFWS; District of Columbia Data Catalogue; Washington D.C. DPR; MD Department of Natural Resources; DE Forest Service; DE Division of Parks and Recreation; PASDA; PA DCNR; CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection; NJDEP; NY OCS; University of Connecticut; RI GIS; RI Division of Planning; RI Department of Environmental Management; MA Department of Conservation and Recreation
* Most of the resources are only partially located in the Affected Environment. The total number of acres represents the total acreage of the parklands, including acreages outside and inside the Affected Environment of the existing NEC or any alternative.
**The ranges represent the different alternative route options considered as part of Alternative 3.

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

Table 7.16-13 : Affected Environment: Section 6(f) Resources - Alternative 3 Route Options
Geography Existing NEC Alternative 3
D.C. to NYC New York City to Hartford Hartford to Boston
# of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Alignment # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. Central Connecticut Long Island Providence Worcester
# of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte.
D.C. 4 165 4 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MD 8 490 14 990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DE 1 90 1 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PA 8 165 9 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NJ 2 40 2 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NY 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 280 0 0 0 0
CT 5 370 0 0 5 370 5 370 2 1,030 1 40
RI 5 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 505 5 320
MA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 34 1,641 30 1,570 6 371 8 650 9 1,535 6 360

Sources: National Rivers Inventory; LWCF; National Atlas of the United States; NPS; U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS; USFWS; District of Columbia Data Catalogue; Washington, D.C., DPR; MD Department of Natural Resources; DE Forest Service; DE Division of Parks and Recreation; PASDA; PA DCNR; CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection; NJDEP; NY OCS; University of Connecticut; RI GIS; RI Division of Planning; RI Department of Environmental Management; MA Department of Conservation and Recreation

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

Table 7.16-14 : Environmental Consequences: Section 6(f) Resources
Geography Existing NEC Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 31
# of 6(f) Resources Acres # of 6(f) Resources2 Acres within the Representative Route2 # of 6(f) Resources2 Acres within the Representative Route2 # of 6(f) Resources2 Acres within the Representative Route2
D.C. 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 20
MD 4 1 4 1 4 1 7 130
DE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
PA 4 10 4 10 5 20 4 10
NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-2 30
CT 5 25 5 25 6 50 5-6 25
RI 4 10 5 20 5 20 4-5 10-20
MA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 20 52 21 62 23 97 23-27 235-245

Source: NEC FUTURE team, 2015
*The ranges represent the different alternative route options considered as part of Alternative 3.
2 All Action Alternatives assume improvements to the existing NEC; therefore, the number of resources presented is inclusive of the existing NEC as well as any new option or off-corridor route associated with each Action Alternative.
Note: While the totals for each alternative include parks that are along the existing NEC, some parks would have additional effects under the alternative. For instance, West Park is located along the existing NEC, but it would have additional impacts under Alternative 1 because of the proposed bridge.

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

Table 7.16-15 : Environmental Consequences: Section 6(f) Resources - Alternative 3 Route Options
Geography Existing NEC Alternative 3
D.C. to NYC New York City to Hartford Hartford to Boston
# of 6(f) Resources Acres # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. Central Connecticut Long Island Providence Worcester
# of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte. # of 6(f) Resources Acres within the Rep. Rte.
D.C. 2 5 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MD 4 1 7 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DE 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PA 4 10 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NY 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30 0 0 0 0
CT 5 25 0 0 5 25 5 25 1 25 0 0
RI 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 20 4 10
MA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 20 52 14 170 5 25 7 55 6 45 4 10

Source: NEC FUTURE team, 20157.17 Electromagnetic Fields and Magnetic Interference Assessment

 

<< Return to Chapter 7.16

 

 

The information posted on this website includes hypertext links or pointers to information created and maintained by other public and/or private organizations. The FRA provides these links and pointers solely for information and convenience. When users select a link to an outside website, they are leaving the NEC FUTURE website and are subject to the privacy and security policies of the owners/sponsors of the outside website. The FRA does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information contained on a linked website, or endorse the organizations sponsoring linked websites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer. The FRA cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked websites and is not responsible for transmissions users receive from linked websites.