skip navigation

Tier 1 EIS

Alternatives Development

Preferred Alternative


The Preferred Alternative defined an NEC investment plan to grow the role of rail in the Northeast. It provided the capacity to dramatically increase the number of trains and improve the railroad’s performance. The Preferred Alternative focused investment on the existing NEC, improving reliability by bringing it to a state of good repair and eliminating chokepoints that cause delays. It added new track to grow the NEC to four tracks at most locations. Trains would operate frequently with improved connections, greatly enhancing travel options. Travel time would also improve. This vision reflects public preferences and is supported by the FRA’s analysis.

The FRA identified the Preferred Alternative based on the evaluation and findings presented in the Tier 1 Draft EIS, public and stakeholder comments, and FRA policy objectives consistent with U.S. Department of Transportation strategic goals. See the Alternatives Development page and Volume 1, Chapter 4 of the Tier 1 Final EIS for information on the alternatives development process.

As a baseline for comparison, consistent with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, the FRA defined and evaluated a No Action Alternative that included planned and programmed improvements to the NEC. For more details on the No Action Alternative, refer to the No Action Alternative Report.

View details on the Preferred Alternative


Enhanced Service Concepts

Preferred Alternative Map


The information posted on this website includes hypertext links or pointers to information created and maintained by other public and/or private organizations. The FRA provides these links and pointers solely for information and convenience. When users select a link to an outside website, they are leaving the NEC FUTURE website and are subject to the privacy and security policies of the owners/sponsors of the outside website. The FRA does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information contained on a linked website, or endorse the organizations sponsoring linked websites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer. The FRA cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked websites and is not responsible for transmissions users receive from linked websites.